TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
The hypothetical Pontiac cases in this edition were chosen for the error each one tends to produce: a civil engineer who assumes the border is the only door, a general manager of a small exporter whose job description reads like a supervisor's, and a well-drilling contractor who buys a majority of a U.S. company without asking who really controls it. None of these people lacks eligibility. Each risks a refusal because a label — a job title, a percentage, a filing route — was accepted in place of the fact behind it.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Each category in this edition has a condition that is easy to misdescribe. For TN it is the difference between a listed profession and a similar job. For L-1A it is managing people against supervising them. For L-1B it is company knowledge against personal skill. For E-2 it is control against ownership. For EB-5 it is a traced path against a large balance. For the Gold Card it is a gift against an investment. Find that condition first.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
A TN case turns on whether the actual work fits a named USMCA profession, not on what the employer calls the job.

Inconsistencies can sink an otherwise supportable case. A support letter that calls the applicant a project coordinator while the résumé says engineer, a shareholder register that contradicts the business plan, a bank statement with a transfer nobody explains: each is a small crack that can become the reason for the decision. Read every document in the file as if you were looking for the contradiction, then resolve it before anyone else finds it.
Meet the people in your corner
Personal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
For each category, identify the single requirement that labels tend to hide and test it against the facts.
Compare the letter, the résumé, the registers and the bank records against each other before anyone official does.
Where a fact falls short, change the arrangement or wait; do not adjust the description to fit the rule.
Confirm each family member's citizenship, age and work permission independently of the principal's case.
The household has its own set of predictable errors. A spouse who starts work on the strength of the principal's approval without checking whether her category permits it. A child listed as a dependant who turned 21 a month before the filing. A permanent-resident partner assumed to be a citizen because the family has lived in Canada for twenty years. Each of these is caught by a five-minute check at the start and is very hard to repair afterwards.
Find your pathwayThis edition covers the Municipalité de Pontiac in the MRC des Collines-de-l'Outaouais, and only that municipality. It claims nothing about what people here do for a living or where they intend to go; the occupations in the examples are simply plausible ones, and the law described is the same federal law that applies in every part of Canada. Shneur Herman, Jo Kubti and Alexander Paton work each file remotely from the applicant's actual records.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Very possibly. The officer classifies the position from the letter, and a coordinator title paired with administrative duties reads as a job outside the listed profession. The letter should say Engineer, describe engineering work and match the résumé and the degree.
Because the duty description shows a person who supervises a few non-professional staff and also does the operating work, which the regulation treats as a first-line supervisor, not a manager. The fix is a truthful account of decisions, budget authority and delegated work, not a grander title.
Not if the shareholders' agreement gives the minority partner a veto over hiring, spending or strategy. Ownership above half creates a presumption of control, but the agreement can take it away, and consular officers read the agreement.
No. Derivative status in every category discussed here ends at 21, and living arrangements or financial dependence do not extend it. The child needs a category of his own, and the family plan should be built around that.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.