Read the general investor planning overview
Hypothetical example: a Chelsea bilingual translation and localization specialist wants to open a U.S. company from scratch with US$130,000 drawn from a home-equity line of credit. A service business needs little equipment, so the question is not whether the sum is large but whether it is proportional to the real cost of starting this enterprise, whether the borrowed money counts, and whether the business will ever be more than a one-person living. Those three tests decide a low-capital E-2 case. The investor must decide which expenditures are genuinely committed to the business and which remain personal reserves. E-2 capital must be placed beyond unilateral withdrawal and exposed to commercial risk; the resulting enterprise must be real, non-marginal, and directed by the investor. Hypothetical example: a watch-repair specialist puts funds into conditional escrow for shop equipment, then learns that a refundable apartment deposit cannot be treated as business capital. She revises the budget before deciding whether the investment is substantial for the actual start-up cost.
Measure the investment against the actual start-up cost
Substantiality is a ratio: the amount invested compared with the total cost of establishing the enterprise. For a translation company the cost is software licences, a lease, initial marketing, professional fees and payroll reserves to reach cash flow. A credible budget totalling US$150,000 with US$130,000 already committed is a high proportion; the same sum against a claimed US$600,000 plan would not be. Prepare an itemized start-up budget with quotations and show which items have been paid, signed or deposited. The consular officer measures commitment against that budget, so inflated projections harm rather than help. The comparison should use a written start-up budget that distinguishes equipment, contractual obligations, and working capital. That document lets the investor decide whether an additional committed outlay is needed before applying.
Borrowed money counts only when the borrower bears the risk
Funds from a home-equity line secured on the applicant’s Chelsea residence can qualify because the applicant is personally liable and the loan is secured by her own assets, not by the U.S. enterprise. The file should include the line-of-credit agreement, the mortgage registration showing the security, statements showing the draw and the transfer to the U.S. company. A loan secured by the business’s own assets would not be at risk to the investor and would not count. The source of any equity used to qualify for the line, such as prior salary or business income, should also be traceable.
Show the business will grow beyond the investor’s own living
An enterprise is marginal if it lacks the capacity, now or within five years, to generate more than a minimal living for the investor and family. A solo translator billing only enough to support herself is the picture to avoid. The plan should show client commitments, a hiring timeline with wage assumptions and projections demonstrating greater capacity by year five. The investor must be a national of a treaty country, Canada qualifies, and the enterprise must have that treaty nationality through at least 50% ownership by nationals of the same treaty country. She must develop and direct the business through at least 50% ownership or operational control. E-2 spouses are employment-authorized incident to status, but outside earnings do not cure marginality, and E-2 provides no direct path to permanent residence.
What else is on your mind?
Is there one minimum investment that guarantees E-2 eligibility?Is holding money or owning an asset enough for E-2?Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.