Skip to content
FOR BUSINESS LEADERS · LA PÊCHELa Pêche

Built in Canada.Ready for more.

Hypothetical example: the co-owner and managing director of a La Pêche specialty coffee-roasting company has run its U.S. subsidiary for four years and eight months under L-1A. Before that she spent fourteen months in the United States in H-1B status for a different employer, a decade ago. She has never added those periods together. L-1A status is limited to seven years, and time spent in H-1B can count toward the same limit unless a full year abroad separated the two stays, so her remaining runway depends on dates she has never checked. The questions now are arithmetic and sequence: how much time is left, whether her frequent trips to the roastery in La Pêche can be recaptured, and whether an immigrant petition for a multinational manager should be started before the limit rather than after.

Talk about L-1A
PurposeExecutive or managerial transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
New officeA distinct evidence requirement

IN THIS GUIDE · Count L-1A years already used, recapture time abroad and plan the step before the seven-year limit

Start with the L-1A eligibility and application overview

01

How the seven years are counted

An L-1A manager or executive may not be granted extensions beyond a total of seven years in the United States in L status, and periods spent in H status count toward that total. The count is of time physically present in the United States in those statuses; days spent outside the United States, documented by passport stamps, boarding passes and travel logs, can be recaptured and added back at the extension stage. In the hypothetical, the earlier H-1B period reduces the available L-1A time unless it was followed by a full year abroad that reset the count, which the rules allow. The managing director should reconstruct every admission and departure since her first U.S. status and present the calculation with evidence in the next extension petition.

02

What must still be true at each extension

An extension is not automatic. The underlying transfer must rest on one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the three years before the transfer, a qualifying parent, branch, subsidiary or affiliate relationship, and active business by both entities. Each Form I-129 extension must show that the qualifying relationship still exists, that both companies are doing business, and that her U.S. duties remain primarily managerial or executive. Hypothetical example: a subsidiary that has grown from three employees to twelve may make managerial capacity easier to show, while one that has shrunk to a single sales associate may make it harder because the manager may be performing the operating work herself. The Canadian roastery must continue operating, which for a co-owner means the other owner and the Canadian staff keep it active while she is away. Extensions are granted in increments of up to two years, and the last one is limited to the time remaining under the cap.

03

The step before the limit: a multinational-manager immigrant petition

The employment-based first-preference category for multinational managers and executives mirrors the L-1A conditions: one year of managerial employment abroad with the related company within the three years before entry, and a U.S. position that is managerial or executive with a petitioner that has been doing business for at least a year. Because L-1 tolerates immigrant intent, filing that petition does not endanger her L-1A. The sequence that works is to file the immigrant petition while at least a year of L-1A remains, so that adjustment of status can be filed when a visa number is available and she is not forced to leave when the cap arrives. Waiting until year seven leaves no margin.

04

What ends L-1A early

The status ends before the cap if the corporate relationship changes, for example if the U.S. subsidiary is sold to an unrelated buyer or the Canadian parent is dissolved; if either company ceases doing business; if her role changes from managing to selling; or if her employment ends, after which a grace period of up to sixty days applies. A change in her ownership of the Canadian company does not by itself end the status, but a change that breaks the parent-subsidiary link does. Her spouse’s L-2 status and work authorization end with hers, and their son’s L-2 ends at 21 in any event, so the immigrant petition should be timed with his age in mind as well.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

L-1A · LA PÊCHE

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.